|
Post by Rodneck on Aug 12, 2016 11:24:05 GMT -5
www.cincinnati.com/story/sports/mlb/reds/2016/08/11/reds-bullpen-serving-laboratory/88573050/Thought this was an interesting read. Less because we finally got an explanation of their approach than them harping on an idea which has been brewing in the head the last month or so. That we have 3 converted starters in the bullpen in Cingrani, Lorenzen, and Iglesias we could have a rotation for the back end of the bullpen. I man one day could go any 2 innings then after an off day get the 9th. But by season's end these guys get 90 or so innings and we get max value out of them. With other relievers used more sparingly their effectiveness could rise also provided they have requisite talent to begin with which a lot of the schleps in our pen don't! But I like this idea of a "Power Pen" as opposed to having all flamethrowers. That doesn't always work.
|
|
|
Post by brad on Aug 12, 2016 13:50:22 GMT -5
Real good read. Could the Reds be leading the pack when it come to the next evolution of bullpens? I don't know if it was stupid or smart, but I always wondered if how an 11 man pitching staff would work if used it like this:
Pitcher 1: Monday, Innings 1-3 Pitcher 2: Monday, Innings 4-6 Pitcher 3: Monday, Innings 7-9 Pitcher 4: Tuesday, Innings 1-3 Pitcher 5: Tuesday, Innings 4-6 Pitcher 6, Tuesday, Innings 7-9 Pitcher 7, Wed: Innings 1-3 Pitcher 8, Wed: Innings 4-6 Pitcher 9, Wed: Innings 7-9 Pitchers 10-11(or 12) sprinkle in as needed:
Hitters tend to have more success the 2nd & 3rd time through the order against starters...but what if the 2nd time through is a pitcher offering a completely different look? Plus, the pitcher wouldn't have to hold back as much to make it through 6-7 innings on the day. If they go every 4th day, that will put about 162 innings/yr on pitchers 1-9. I don't know how feasible it is with arm durabilty, but I always thought it would be an interesting experiment.
|
|
|
Post by vb1123 on Aug 12, 2016 15:22:59 GMT -5
Another view might be that the reds tried to make 3 relievers into starters(Chappy as well) and they all regressed either by performance/health/attitude back to what they were in their formative teens/early 20's. And now they're trying the same w/ Finny and several others. And I'm not bitching about it, I like trying to find SP'ers from good young arms w/ stuff. It just seems like this experiment isn't working so well under uber coach Price. Fire his arse today. Just a daily reminder.
|
|
|
Post by Rodneck on Aug 13, 2016 9:28:49 GMT -5
Lorenzen and Iglesias started as relievers solely and with their durability issues it's obvious they should go to the bullpen. With Chapman he had no durability issues we just relented to Dusty's wish and that was it. We fucked up. With these 2 though it would be a damn shame IMO to just slot them 8 and 9 and call it a day. And no closer by committee BS either. But 2 guys who can go multiple innings and be the fireman and also close. That there are 2 guys it can lock down a game late in IMO a far more efficient not to mention cheaper manner than what the Yankees tried to do(although I am not arguing the infinite talent of Chapman, Miller, Betances). But I think our 2 guys have not hit their ceiling as relievers yet. With the way the Reds are talking about matchups and throwing strength of pitcher to weakness of hitter as opposed to the generic lefty lefty righty righty conept, you add this style of bullpen and it could be a new wave of bullpen utility. And you maximize the talent you have. And you preserve the lesser arms in the pen. I am intrigued by this.
With Finnegan he is showing durability. In fact he hasn't been allowed to show any durability because he barely pitched in his pro career and because KC used him in the BP the first year he was drafted everybody automatically sees him as a BP guy. C'mon guys wake up! Only if he is incapable of evolving or starts to break down physically should we even consider a different role.Before this season Finnegan since being drafted in 2014 had pitched in both minors and majors a total of 139 innings. By comparison Johnny Cueto had pitched just under 348 innings before his callup. He had a 4.81 ERA that year to Finnegan's 4.94. So I'm not writing him off just yet. I think he's doing OK for such little experience.
|
|
|
Post by Rodneck on Aug 13, 2016 9:33:33 GMT -5
Real good read. Could the Reds be leading the pack when it come to the next evolution of bullpens? I don't know if it was stupid or smart, but I always wondered if how an 11 man pitching staff would work if used it like this: Pitcher 1: Monday, Innings 1-3 Pitcher 2: Monday, Innings 4-6 Pitcher 3: Monday, Innings 7-9 Pitcher 4: Tuesday, Innings 1-3 Pitcher 5: Tuesday, Innings 4-6 Pitcher 6, Tuesday, Innings 7-9 Pitcher 7, Wed: Innings 1-3 Pitcher 8, Wed: Innings 4-6 Pitcher 9, Wed: Innings 7-9 Pitchers 10-11(or 12) sprinkle in as needed: Hitters tend to have more success the 2nd & 3rd time through the order against starters...but what if the 2nd time through is a pitcher offering a completely different look? Plus, the pitcher wouldn't have to hold back as much to make it through 6-7 innings on the day. If they go every 4th day, that will put about 162 innings/yr on pitchers 1-9. I don't know how feasible it is with arm durabilty, but I always thought it would be an interesting experiment. Brad this is interesting indeed. But I think it's totally nuts! LOL!
|
|
|
Post by davis44 on Aug 16, 2016 7:33:47 GMT -5
Quite frankly, I'm sick and tired of Bryan Price thinking that he's gonna re-write the book on how to use a bullpen!!
This continued bs on how match-ups don't matter is exactly why you've had a bottom 5 bullpen since the day u took over!
|
|
|
Post by brad on Aug 16, 2016 12:38:20 GMT -5
It's all about the arms. Get rid of The Hoove, Dayan Diaz, JC Ramirez and the rest of the motley, replace with Lorenzen & Iglesias, and the improvement has be remarkably actually. We've got a top 5-6 bullpen by ERA going back to the week Lorenzen & Iglesias joined it.
|
|
|
Post by Rodneck on Aug 16, 2016 13:37:08 GMT -5
It's all about the arms. Get rid of The Hoove, Dayan Diaz, JC Ramirez and the rest of the motley, replace with Lorenzen & Iglesias, and the improvement has be remarkably actually. We've got a top 5-6 bullpen by ERA going back to the week Lorenzen & Iglesias joined it. You are right Brad. It's all about talent. You can make decisions based on anything and be right when the talent is there. Bullpen is this since the ASB=2.71/1.17 ,3.8 BB9-9.7 K9. And all we did as you said was subtract bullshit and add 2 good arms. Remarkable. I do believe that solid arms do settle into roles and it creates it's own hierarchy which leads to what Davis is saying. But when it's chaos and there is no talent as it was before the ASB using whatever philosophy is as good as anything. The reason I started this thread is because I think that nothing is written in stone and the game is changing and will change and the ideas written about do shed some light. It's easy to look at a team that's failing and say they are all fucked. But they have turned it around completely and you have to give credit where credit is due. My only beef with Price is he has severely bad timing. Like last night. Wood totally and apparently lost his control and he let him go til the game was out of reach.
|
|
|
Post by Rodneck on Aug 16, 2016 13:40:45 GMT -5
Quite frankly, I'm sick and tired of Bryan Price thinking that he's gonna re-write the book on how to use a bullpen!! This continued bs on how match-ups don't matter is exactly why you've had a bottom 5 bullpen since the day u took over! I don't mind somebody trying to be innovative but you can't be innovative with dogshit in hand! LOL! But somebody teach this guy how to use the stage hook.
|
|
|
Post by socalredsfan on Aug 19, 2016 12:15:37 GMT -5
Quite frankly, I'm sick and tired of Bryan Price thinking that he's gonna re-write the book on how to use a bullpen!! This continued bs on how match-ups don't matter is exactly why you've had a bottom 5 bullpen since the day u took over! I certainly haven't been the biggest fan of Price, but to blame him for having the worst bullpen, is just not right. Since the two kids have come back, this has become one of the best bullpens in the game. You need decent talent to have a good bullpen, and Price has not had that at all. Personally, I love what he's doing with the bullpen right now. In fact, I'm not so sure he's re-writing any book. It appears he's trying to maximize his best arms in tough situations and late innings. I'm seeing a little bit of the Nasty Boys style in this bullpen, without the attitude of course.
|
|
|
Post by socalredsfan on Aug 19, 2016 12:22:19 GMT -5
Lorenzen and Iglesias started as relievers solely and with their durability issues it's obvious they should go to the bullpen. With Chapman he had no durability issues we just relented to Dusty's wish and that was it. We fucked up. With these 2 though it would be a damn shame IMO to just slot them 8 and 9 and call it a day. And no closer by committee BS either. But 2 guys who can go multiple innings and be the fireman and also close. That there are 2 guys it can lock down a game late in IMO a far more efficient not to mention cheaper manner than what the Yankees tried to do(although I am not arguing the infinite talent of Chapman, Miller, Betances). But I think our 2 guys have not hit their ceiling as relievers yet. With the way the Reds are talking about matchups and throwing strength of pitcher to weakness of hitter as opposed to the generic lefty lefty righty righty conept, you add this style of bullpen and it could be a new wave of bullpen utility. And you maximize the talent you have. And you preserve the lesser arms in the pen. I am intrigued by this. With Finnegan he is showing durability. In fact he hasn't been allowed to show any durability because he barely pitched in his pro career and because KC used him in the BP the first year he was drafted everybody automatically sees him as a BP guy. C'mon guys wake up! Only if he is incapable of evolving or starts to break down physically should we even consider a different role.Before this season Finnegan since being drafted in 2014 had pitched in both minors and majors a total of 139 innings. By comparison Johnny Cueto had pitched just under 348 innings before his callup. He had a 4.81 ERA that year to Finnegan's 4.94. So I'm not writing him off just yet. I think he's doing OK for such little experience. Completely agree with you about Finnegan. This kid is going to be very, very, solid. Confidence and experience are what he is missing. Once he gains that, and this year will go a long ways towards that, you will see his walks decrease, and of course his HR's decrease. Just look at DeSclafani's career to date. Now granted, he didn't have BB and HR issues, like Finnegan, but he now has the experience and confidence to locate his pitches so much better. DeSclafani is so much better than I ever imagined he would be, and he manages the game so well now. I think we will see crazy improvement with Finnegan next year, as long as he isn't given up on.
|
|